Posts Tagged ‘2008 Election’

Its all about the New World order stupid

October 3, 2007

PhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto

Less health care for the children maybe all the teeth in the childrens mouth will fall out and they will no longer be able to eat-get my point-the new world order.

Iraq is More Important then Health Insurance for Kids

I’m a little confused. Someone unconfuse me.

1 bill.  1 bill for health insurance. 1 bill to help millions of poor children get insurance. 1 bill that Bush just vetoed.

Fact: Bush has spent, or will spend $700 BILLION for a war in Iraq.  Bush feels spending $35 billion is too much money to insure 4 million poor children who are without healthcare right now.

Fact: Bush has given $50 BILLION in subsidies for huge oil companies but feels not enough americans deserve health insurance.

Are children the bottom feeders?  I’m a single mother, I only make 40K a year.  I’m told I make too much for state insurance, yet, my taxes go to pay for medicare for ADULTS who are capable of working so they can have health insurance.  My taxes.  I can’t afford the $700 a month premium at my work to insure my daughter.  I had to take a policy with a $2,500 deductible in order to afford any kind of insurance. 

I feel freaking duped by our government suddenly.  Can’t they for once just agree that our kids should come first. 

This saddens me. Seriously saddens me.  It’s no wonder we can’t get our priorities straight.

Here’s to all those poor children, sorry kids, no medicines for you today, hopefully you’ll survive another day.

Thank you President Bush, thank you.

http://leesaann1173.wordpress.com/

PhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto

Read story below: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan

Bush vetoes child health insurance plan Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press

October 3, 2007

Bush vetoes child health insurance plan

By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer 10 minutes ago October 3, 2007

President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children’s health insurance.

PhotoPhoto

It was only the fourth veto of Bush’s presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year’s elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

Democrats unleashed a stream of harsh rhetoric, as they geared up for a battle to both improve their chances of winning a veto override and score political points against Republicans who oppose the expansion.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush’s action as a “heartless veto.”

“Never has it been clearer how detached President Bush is from the priorities of the American people,” Reid said in a statement. “By vetoing a bipartisan bill to renew the successful Children’s Health Insurance Program, President Bush is denying health care to millions of low-income kids in America.”

Democratic congressional leaders said they may put off the override attempt for as long as two weeks to maximize pressure on Republican House members whose votes will be critical.

“We remain committed to making SCHIP into law — with or without the president’s support,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., referring to the full name of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

The White House sought little attention for Bush’s action, with the president casting his veto behind closed doors without any fanfare or news coverage. He defended it later Wednesday during a budget speech in Lancaster, Pa., addressing a welcoming audience organized by the Lancaster Chamber of Commerce and Industry in GOP-friendly Pennsylvania Dutch country.

Photo

“Poor kids first,” Bush said. “Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system.”

But he seemed eager to avert a full-scale showdown over the difficult issue, offering that he is “more than willing” to negotiate with lawmakers “if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children.”

The program is a joint state-federal effort that subsidizes health coverage for 6.6 million people, mostly children, from families that earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to afford their own private coverage.

The Democrats who control Congress, with significant support from Republicans, passed the legislation to add $35 billion over five years to allow an additional 4 million children into the program. It would be funded by raising the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents to $1 per pack.

The president argued that the Democratic bill was too costly, took the program too far beyond its original intent of helping the poor, and would entice people now covered in the private sector to switch to government coverage. He has proposed only a $5 billion increase in funding. After Bush’s speech, White House counselor Ed Gillespie said the president’s offer of more money meant more than the $5 billion extra, but he wasn’t specific about how much more.

Photo

Democrats deny Bush’s charge that their plan is a move toward socialized medicine that short-changes the poor, saying their goal is to cover more of the millions of uninsured children and noting that the bill provides financial incentives for states to cover their lowest-income children first. Of the over 43 million people nationwide who lack health insurance, over 6 million are under 18 years old. That’s over 9 percent of all children.

Photo

Eighteen Republicans joined Democrats in the Senate, enough to override Bush’s veto. But in the House, supporters of the bill are about two dozen votes short of a successful override, despite sizable Republican support. A two-thirds majority in both chambers is needed.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said Democrats were imploring 15 House Republicans to switch positions but had received no agreements so far.

House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said he was “absolutely confident” that the House would be able to sustain Bush’s expected veto.

Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, R-Miss., said Congress should be able to reach a compromise with Bush once he vetoes the bill. “We should not allow it to be expanded to higher and higher income levels, and to adults. This is about poor children,” he said. “But we can work it out.”

It took Bush six years to veto his first bill, when he blocked expanded federal research using embryonic stem cells last summer. In May, he vetoed a spending bill that would have required troop withdrawals from Iraq. In June, he vetoed another bill to ease restraints on federally funded stem cell research.

In the case of the health insurance program, the veto is a bit of a high-stakes gambit for Bush, pitting him against both the Democrats who have controlled both houses of Congress since January, but also many members of his own party and the public.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launched radio ads Monday attacking eight GOP House members who voted against the bill and face potentially tough re-election campaigns next year.

And Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union, said a coalition of liberal groups was staging more than 200 events throughout the nation on Thursday to highlight the issue. The group, which includes MoveOn.org, and several unions, also has a goal of more than 1 million contacts to Congress through calls, letters and e-mails demanding that lawmakers override Bush’s veto. The coalition is spending $3 million to $5 million on the effort.

Photo

Photo

Alex Jones’ ENDGAME – Trailer

September 27, 2007

Alex Jones’ ENDGAME – Trailer

Alan Greenspan’s Role in US Dollar Collapse

September 27, 2007

Alan Greenspan’s Role in US Dollar Collapse

The box of Lies

September 27, 2007

                                                     

  

 

How long will this go on for?

You tell me

 

Andrew Meyer, 21, who was tasered and arrested

September 26, 2007

NEW VIDEO: University of Florida Taser Incident

Raw footage of the Sept 17, 2007 taser incident at the University of Florida involving Andrew Meyer, 21, who was tasered and arrested by police after attempting to speak at a question and answer session with John Kerry (D-Mass).

Meyer is being charged with resisting an officer and disturbing the peace.

If a person can not ask an elected leader in the USA a question in a public forum and ask for an answer without being arrested and tasered in public and the very people in that room just let it happen…well the police state of the government have now won!

This is terrorism by the police state on the people of the USA by the USA. Wake up America and stand tall against your government and take back your government and your nation back away from those that do this to you. Why do you just keep allowing this to continue?

-Kyle

University of Florida student Andrew Meyer being hit by a Taser during a John Kerry event.

September 26, 2007

Student Tasered at Kerry Event

If a person can not ask an elected leader in the USA a question in a public forum and ask for an answer without being arrested and tasered in public and the very people in that room just let it happen…well the police state of the government have now won!

This is terrorism by the police state on the people of the USA by the USA. Wake up America and stand tall against your government and take back your government and your nation back away from those that do this to you. Why do you just keep allowing this to continue?

If that is democracy, fuck America.

-Kyle

wtf was wrong whit the rest of all ?? why dont u do nothing?? ..some is Laughing… ? wtf is wrong whit u usa people? .. dont u just see that kind of thing? … wat about nobody stud up to kerry? … he was Allowing all this

you can’t get arrested for asking a question. you can get arrested for disrupting an event. but when you get tazed by a swarm of people in uniform, then your rights are violated.things like these should happen more often. if you can’t check the government without getting tazered then you’re supporting a government with their own definiton of freedom.

ANTI WAR DIE IN 9.15.2007 Re-thinking the strategy for the future

September 18, 2007

ANTI WAR DIE IN(9.15.07): re-thinking strategy for future

11 september 2007 9/11/07 Official We Are Change Promo Video Release

September 10, 2007

11 september 2007

this needs to be a tv commercial, seriously. I wonder how many people are watching home videos of kittens right now.

breaking the silence Truth And Lies In The War On Terror – John Pilger

September 10, 2007

51 min 50 sec 

 http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4527835028345509000

John Pilger dissects the truth and lies in the ‘war on terror’. Award-winning journalist John Pilger investigates the discrepancies between American and British claims for the ‘war on terror’ and the facts on the ground as he finds them in Afghanistan and Washington, DC. In 2001, as the bombs began to drop, George W. Bush promised Afghanistan “the generosity of America and its allies”. Now, the familiar old warlords are regaining power, religious fundamentalism is renewing its grip and military skirmishes continue routinely. In “liberated” Afghanistan, America has its military base and pipeline access, while the people have the warlords who are, says one woman, “in many ways worse than the Taliban”.

In Washington, Pilger conducts a series of remarkable interviews with William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, and leading Administration officials such as Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. These people, and the other architects of the Project for the New American Century, were dismissed as ‘the crazies’ by the first Bush Administration in the early 90s when they first presented their ideas for pre-emptive strikes and world domination.Pilger also interviews presidential candidate General Wesley Clark, and former intelligence officers, all the while raising searching questions about the real motives for the ‘war on terror’.

While President Bush refers to the US attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq as two ‘great victories’, Pilger asks the question – victories over whom, and for what purpose? Pilger describes Afghanistan as a country “more devastated than anything I have seen since Pol Pot’s Cambodia”. He finds that Al-Qaida has not been defeated and that the Taliban is re-emerging. And of the “victory” in Iraq, he asks: “Is this Bush’s Vietnam?”